I have really been concerned about the cost of fuel and the damage being done to our environment by fossil fuels. I ran across the following video which really intrigued me.
Here is another video with some very interesting information on Stanley Meyer.
I found these videos on the following website:
http://waterpoweredcar.com/stanmeyer.html
Below is what the website said about Stan Meyer, the inventor of the water powered car.
Stan Meyer's Dune Buggy that ran on water. Hydrogen/Oxygen fuel in an ICE motor. On board electrolysis, no hydrogen tanks, no bombs on-board, just water. (1998) It ran 100 miles per gallon! The 2nd best inventor of the Century, besides Tesla, who was and will always be #1. Stan is the mustard seed of Water Powered Cars!
The first video above is a one timed aired news cast, from his home town of Grove City, Ohio that you are not to view. The second video above is a segment of the Equinox program about Stanley aired back in Dec. 1995 (approx.) See the entire program entitled "It Runs on Water" narrated by Arthur C. Clarke in video clips below. It is in 4 parts, made possible by Andy the WizardKing from Blackpool, England. (These can be viewed by going to the above mentioned website and clicking on one of 4 video clips.)
The four videos can also be seen at the following site:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=871102105173074920#
The article then continued...
It was a shame to hear that he was poisoned (March 98') and longer with us. He died in the parking lot of a restaurant in his home town of Grove City, Ohio. Sharks came a week later and stole the the dune buggy and all of his experimental equipment, according to his brother, Steve. Stan said while he was alive, that he was threatened many times and would not sell out to Arab Oil Corp.s The Military was going to use this technology in their tanks, jeeps, etc. He had patents on his invention and was ready for production. Only $1,500 to equip your car! See the Videos above. No gasoline, just water. Stanley said he was offered a billion dollars from an Arab to basically shelf his idea. Stan said, "no, this technology is for the people." Who you suppose poisoned Stan? A jealous onlooker? Do you think the Oil Corp.'s are happy to see a converted car running for FREE?? Our own US DOE, and the present administration are heavily involved in the Oil business. If GW wanted my respect,I'd have inventors like Stan on TV and with me in the White House, discussing how to save this dying planet and break the bonds of ruled corruption and greed. I have read the DOE's hydrogen & fuel cell technology and they don't mention making hydrogen from pure water, until the last page. They rather get hydrogen from hydrocarbons. They don't mention "On Board Hydrogen Electrolysis" make the egas as you go. They talk about Hydrogen Gas Stations at how much per gallon?
So what is happening with Stan's Great Invention of the 20th Century!! Absolutely nothing. Are they manufacturing his invention. NO, Why not? Because it would solve all the world's problems today.
That is NOT how politics work, MONEY is the ruler here. Common Sense is NOT for humans, only good for OUTLAWS & so called terrorists.? Huh? We live in a time when good is spoken of as evil and evil spoken up as good. Why do I say that? Because it is true.
We were told the US twin towers was taken down by airplanes, when the truth is, it was taken down by C4 explosives. William Rodriguez holds the master key, he was there that day, he lost his job and 250 of his friends and colleges. Connect the dots, it is that simple. Sorry to have shocked you and made your face turn red, but Building #7 came down in 7 seconds, not reported in the 911 commission report. No planes hit that building, only a few offices fires happened. It was all too fishy from me, and continues to stink like a dead rat.
All they talk about is hydrogen gas stations run by Shell and a Canadian Oil Firm. Then they talk all about "hydrogen fuel cells" which take a lifetime of gas burned just to make one fuel cell. A hydrogen fuel cell factory is a real SMOG factory. To explain better read on. Their fuel Cells are not as efficient as a "On board Hydrogen Electrolysis" fuel cell. Stan made the gas as he drove, no hydrogen tanks, no fuel cells, no need for Shell Hydrogen Stations. He spent 30 years of research all on his own.
GOOD NEWS! Steve Meyer, Stan's twin brother lives! He is into the same
technology! He stays low key, because he wants to live.
Why is there only one website on him? WCCO.com News 4/11/06
To totally learn this technology go to
I have some .pdf files for you to
Download all of Stan's writings, circuits, etc.
StanleyMeyer.com
-------------------------------
Recent Harassment on a Stan Meyer Cell Builder in India 2-1-07
We are familiar with the suppression of free-energy devices. In the USA there have been literally thousands of cases - for example, Bill Williams for running his truck on a Joe Cell, T Henry Moray for pulling kilowatts out of the environment and Ed Gray for daring to have a power tube with an output power 100 times the input power.
In Australia there is intense opposition to anyone using the Nitro Cell on any engine. In New Zealand, to the magnetic motor of Robert Adams which is 700% efficient. In the UK, to devices for water-splitting and permanent magnet motors. In Japan to Teruo Kawai’s patented magnetic motor which is 160% efficient.
But in the last week there has been an instance of it in India, in spite of the fact that the bus service in Mumbai has been run on hydrogen for some years now. A man, who wishes to remain anonymous in order not to aggravate the current situation, has just been picked on. He has been running a business for the last 23 years and has a good relationship with his local Commercial Taxation Office staff.
He became interested in Dave Lawton’s replication and decided to try it for himself. The seven pictures which I have placed in the Files section of the Group in the folder “RAVZZ” show his high standard of workmanship. He encountered a minor problem with his implementation of the electronic driving circuit, and so contacted Dave Lawton for technical advice. This was given and the problem solved. He then e-mailed Dave some pictures showing his progress.
Within 8 hours, his premises were raided by nine people supposedly from the local Tax Office. In actual fact, six of them were from the local office and the other three were unknown to the locals who had been ordered to take them along. During their search of the place, the man was told that he would be well advised to discontinue all work connected to hydrogen. That shows clearly that the “raid” had nothing whatsoever to do with taxation and the Tax Office was just being used as an excuse to invade the privacy of an individual.
They spent six hours checking everything eventually left, taking commercial records with them, and subsequently requested that our friend attend their local office on Wednesday (the day before yesterday). He attended, sensibly taking people from his business as witnesses. The six local officials were there and they returned the records taken, stating that there was nothing wrong with the records or the tax position. They also said that they were bewildered by the whole affair. He asked them about the other three men, and they said that the Commissioners office had asked them to take them along....and they have no idea who they were!
He then had a long conversation with the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer who had came over to his place. He also seemed confused as to why they were hurried up to go over to his place from the Commissioners office. He said that the Commissioners office received a complaint from some higher authorities and these people were given written instructions (an unusual thing in itself) to go to his office and make some checks, usually this happens but the visits are done after 3-4 days of the receipt of the letter from the Commissioners office based on the time allotment, but in this case there were 4 calls directly from the Commissioners office to go over to his place immediately !!
This is a typical case of deliberate intimidation and it is unusual only because it is in India. It also shows that Dave Lawton’s e-mails are being intercepted and read as this man did not mention his hydrogen work to anyone else. Dave once made the mistake of applying for a development grant from his Local Authority. The grant was to help develop one of his inventions. He was visited by two unpleasant individuals who took away his written proposal. Nothing ever came of it and when Dave asked for his documents back, they lied, saying that they has posted them. When he pressured them, they did eventually send the documents back, and the date stamp on the envelope shows that the documents were posted long after they originally claimed that they had been sent. It turns out that these men have no connection with the Local Authority Grants section and it seems clear that they fall into the same category as the three “unknown” men in India who carried out the raid. Presumably, Dave’s phone calls and e-mails have been intercepted and monitored ever since and that is what triggered the raid in India.
The raid in India is very interesting in that it shows clearly that the opposition are very much afraid of Stan Meyer’s Water Fuel Cell. This implies that the cell is capable of producing serious amounts of free-energy and can break our dependency on fossil fuels.
February 2, 2007
Why is it that bad things happen to good people? Is this just a coincidence or is there more behind the scenes that the public is not supposed to see?
If I become President I will investigate and get down to the bottom of all of this. Good ideas need to be used, even if the financial purses of some dwindle.
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Ted Gunderson talks about U.S. government corruption and the Oklahoma City bombing
In March, 2011 I went into the Los Angeles FBI to see if they would do anything to investigate and/or prosecute individuals working within and/or for the Department of Homeland Security and specifically TSA (Transportation Security Administration). On April 16, 2009 I was wrongfully accused of battery by a TSA agent and was thrown in jail for over 7 hours. It took 1 1/2 years of my life and $20,000 to prove my innocence. I became directly involved with the investigative work as it related to my case and I have documented proof of 2 felonies committed by government officials against me during my prosecution. The agent looked at me in the investigating cubicle and told me they would not do anything. And this is where our tax dollars go???
While in the FBI building, I had the opportunity to meet Ted Gunderson. He used to be in charge of the Los Angeles FBI. If we want to talk about credibility, I'll believe this man before I believe anything that we are being fed in the media.
Here is a video interview that Alex Jones did with Ted in 2010.
I've sent for the CD's and will be posting some of the documents. One of them, which talks about how our government was involved in the Oklahoma City Federal Building bombing, is listed below. Althought the presentation might not be the most "professional", all of the data is there. I'll let you decide if Ted might be more right than wrong.
The Gunderson Report on the Bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building Oklahoma City_ Oklah -
While in the FBI building, I had the opportunity to meet Ted Gunderson. He used to be in charge of the Los Angeles FBI. If we want to talk about credibility, I'll believe this man before I believe anything that we are being fed in the media.
Here is a video interview that Alex Jones did with Ted in 2010.
I've sent for the CD's and will be posting some of the documents. One of them, which talks about how our government was involved in the Oklahoma City Federal Building bombing, is listed below. Althought the presentation might not be the most "professional", all of the data is there. I'll let you decide if Ted might be more right than wrong.
The Gunderson Report on the Bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building Oklahoma City_ Oklah -
Monday, May 23, 2011
I Can Run For President of the United States of America For Very Little Money
Congressman Gallegly just moved to Camarillo. That is indeed a blessing for me now that gas prices are so high. I had a very insightful conversation with Tina, one of his secretaries.
I told Tina I was going to run for President of the United States. She laughed at me and told me of all the "legalities" and money that would be involved.
I have not had the time to investigate this any further, but I will not pay fees to anyone to run for President. I think I should have the right to do that as a law-abiding American citizen. If I have to, I will do it as a write-in candidate. Here is what I read on Wikipedia regarding that:
The final way to be elected for president is to have one's name written in at the time of election as a write-in candidate. This is used for candidates who did not fulfill the legal requirements to be pre-listed on the voting ticket. It is also used by voters to express a distaste for the listed candidates, by writing in an alternative candidate for president such as Mickey Mouse or comedian Stephen Colbert (whose application was voted down by the South Carolina Democratic Party). In any event, a write-in candidate has never won an election for President of the United States.
Well, I could be the first!
I told Tina I was going to run for President of the United States. She laughed at me and told me of all the "legalities" and money that would be involved.
I have not had the time to investigate this any further, but I will not pay fees to anyone to run for President. I think I should have the right to do that as a law-abiding American citizen. If I have to, I will do it as a write-in candidate. Here is what I read on Wikipedia regarding that:
The final way to be elected for president is to have one's name written in at the time of election as a write-in candidate. This is used for candidates who did not fulfill the legal requirements to be pre-listed on the voting ticket. It is also used by voters to express a distaste for the listed candidates, by writing in an alternative candidate for president such as Mickey Mouse or comedian Stephen Colbert (whose application was voted down by the South Carolina Democratic Party). In any event, a write-in candidate has never won an election for President of the United States.
Well, I could be the first!
If a Pregnant Woman Saw Her Baby Maybe She Would Not Choose to Abort
I just was reading about some recent legislation that was being signed in the state of Texas by Governor Rick Perry. Below is the article that was on LifeNews.com:
Thanks to Governor Rick Perry, legislation that will allow women who are considering an abortion to see an ultrasound of their unborn child beforehand will become state law.
“Governor Perry was pleased to sign this important legislation, which bolsters our efforts to protect life by ensuring Texans are fully informed when considering such an important decision,” said Katherine Cesinger, a spokeswoman for the governor, according to various media reports.
The legislation allows women to see the ultrasound 24 hours before the abortion and abortion centers typically do ultrasounds to estimate the age of the baby before the abortion but they don’t normally allow women a chance to see or explain to them in detail the development of their unborn child. When used in pregnancy centers offering abortion alternatives, approximately 80 percent of women change their mind about having an abortion.
Women who live 100 miles or more from am abortion center wait two hours from the ultrasound to the abortion and they are given the option to decline to view the ultrasound.
The Senate passed the bill on second reading on a 21-10 vote and all hostile, pro-abortion amendments by Sens. Wendy Davis, Jose Rodriguez, and Leticia Van de Putte were defeated. After the Texas Senate signed off on the legislation, the state House, on a 94-41 vote, voted to concur on the Senate changes to HB 15, the sonogram bill.
During the debate, the biggest point of contention was whether women should be allowed to see the ultrasound 24 hours before the abortion so they have time to reflect on the information and images showing the development of their unborn child. Without the reflection time, legislators were concerned abortion businesses may rush women into abortions they may not otherwise want if given time for consideration.
Sen. Carlos Uresti, a San Antonio Democrat, said the 24-hour waiting time would make it hard on women who live in rural areas because they would need to make two trips to the abortion center.
Personally I think it should be mandatory for women to see the ultrsound before having an abortion. If you have not yet felt where my heart is, I think abortions should be illegal. It is indeed murder. Someone has to be pretty stupid to say otherwise.
Thanks to Governor Rick Perry, legislation that will allow women who are considering an abortion to see an ultrasound of their unborn child beforehand will become state law.
“Governor Perry was pleased to sign this important legislation, which bolsters our efforts to protect life by ensuring Texans are fully informed when considering such an important decision,” said Katherine Cesinger, a spokeswoman for the governor, according to various media reports.
The legislation allows women to see the ultrasound 24 hours before the abortion and abortion centers typically do ultrasounds to estimate the age of the baby before the abortion but they don’t normally allow women a chance to see or explain to them in detail the development of their unborn child. When used in pregnancy centers offering abortion alternatives, approximately 80 percent of women change their mind about having an abortion.
Women who live 100 miles or more from am abortion center wait two hours from the ultrasound to the abortion and they are given the option to decline to view the ultrasound.
The Senate passed the bill on second reading on a 21-10 vote and all hostile, pro-abortion amendments by Sens. Wendy Davis, Jose Rodriguez, and Leticia Van de Putte were defeated. After the Texas Senate signed off on the legislation, the state House, on a 94-41 vote, voted to concur on the Senate changes to HB 15, the sonogram bill.
During the debate, the biggest point of contention was whether women should be allowed to see the ultrasound 24 hours before the abortion so they have time to reflect on the information and images showing the development of their unborn child. Without the reflection time, legislators were concerned abortion businesses may rush women into abortions they may not otherwise want if given time for consideration.
Sen. Carlos Uresti, a San Antonio Democrat, said the 24-hour waiting time would make it hard on women who live in rural areas because they would need to make two trips to the abortion center.
Personally I think it should be mandatory for women to see the ultrsound before having an abortion. If you have not yet felt where my heart is, I think abortions should be illegal. It is indeed murder. Someone has to be pretty stupid to say otherwise.
Sunday, May 22, 2011
The Sanctity of Life
I really liked what I heard on this video. All I have to say is "Amen." Take a look and see what you think.
I too believe in the sanctity of life. Living by the standards created by God is of utmost importance.
Procreation is one of the most wonderful gifts we have been given and it is very upsetting to see so many people look at life in the womb as an object rather than a person.
If an individual is raped and they do not want to have the baby, they should be responsible enough to take the morning after pill. Once the fetus has begun to grow, it should be allowed to grow to maturity. There are so many people in this country that would love to have a baby and are not able to. Giving a baby away is far more appropriate than having it aborted. God has created that child and it should be allowed to live.
There is a famous phrase, "What God has joined together let no man put asunder." All though this phrase is is typically heard in marriage ceremonies, it applies to all of God's creations, including procreation. This phrase communicates God's authority over man. Some people want to deny God's existence. Personally I just cannot see how anyone can do that with the wonders of the universe, especially that of life.
Other key points made by Wendy Wright in this interview included the sanctity of marriage, the parents' role in the education of their children. the importance of religious freedom, and homosexuality. I will try to discuss these topics separately. That's for another day.
I too believe in the sanctity of life. Living by the standards created by God is of utmost importance.
Procreation is one of the most wonderful gifts we have been given and it is very upsetting to see so many people look at life in the womb as an object rather than a person.
If an individual is raped and they do not want to have the baby, they should be responsible enough to take the morning after pill. Once the fetus has begun to grow, it should be allowed to grow to maturity. There are so many people in this country that would love to have a baby and are not able to. Giving a baby away is far more appropriate than having it aborted. God has created that child and it should be allowed to live.
There is a famous phrase, "What God has joined together let no man put asunder." All though this phrase is is typically heard in marriage ceremonies, it applies to all of God's creations, including procreation. This phrase communicates God's authority over man. Some people want to deny God's existence. Personally I just cannot see how anyone can do that with the wonders of the universe, especially that of life.
Other key points made by Wendy Wright in this interview included the sanctity of marriage, the parents' role in the education of their children. the importance of religious freedom, and homosexuality. I will try to discuss these topics separately. That's for another day.
Friday, May 20, 2011
It's Time to Stop Being Ignorant and To Start Becoming Informed
Obama has never been my favorite president. Now I know why. Watch this video instead of CSI tonight. It's long but it will make your mouth drop open.
Some will say this is a conspiracy theory. I can tell you from my personal experience with the Transportation Security Administration, part of Homeland Security, that what they are saying is true. I too had my head buried in the sand of ignorance until I started doing my own private investigative work regarding the felonies that were committed against me by the Federal government.
What I now see I don't like. The country I used to love is now doomed to fail unless we as a nation wake up and take charge. After all, this is OUR country, NOT the government's. The government is supposed to work for us, not us for it.
Vote for me in 2012 and I will MAKE THE CHANGE!
Some will say this is a conspiracy theory. I can tell you from my personal experience with the Transportation Security Administration, part of Homeland Security, that what they are saying is true. I too had my head buried in the sand of ignorance until I started doing my own private investigative work regarding the felonies that were committed against me by the Federal government.
What I now see I don't like. The country I used to love is now doomed to fail unless we as a nation wake up and take charge. After all, this is OUR country, NOT the government's. The government is supposed to work for us, not us for it.
Vote for me in 2012 and I will MAKE THE CHANGE!
Working Together We Can Restore America
Below is part of a speech given by President Obama. Listen to it carefully.
Well, just as the people of Tunisia revolted, we the American people are about to revolt. We, however, are not going to overthrow the government we have today. Instead we will restore it to the government it was always supposed to be.
We can start off by throwing out most of the laws that have been created to suppress the American people. We probably will need to have a committee weed through the mess. Personally I think we can operate just fine with the 10 Commandments and the U.S. Constitution. I even have some improvements on that, but that is for another day.
Well, just as the people of Tunisia revolted, we the American people are about to revolt. We, however, are not going to overthrow the government we have today. Instead we will restore it to the government it was always supposed to be.
We can start off by throwing out most of the laws that have been created to suppress the American people. We probably will need to have a committee weed through the mess. Personally I think we can operate just fine with the 10 Commandments and the U.S. Constitution. I even have some improvements on that, but that is for another day.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)