A good friend of mine, who is also our financial advisor, sent the following story to me today. I thought it was appropriate to share it at this time with Christmas right around the corner.
A brother and sister had made their usual hurried, obligatory pre- Christmas visit to the little farm where dwelt their elderly parents with their small herd of horses. The farm was where they had grown up and had been named Lone Pine Farm because of the huge pine, which topped the hill behind the farm. Through the years the tree had become a talisman to the old man and his wife, and a landmark in the countryside... The young siblings had fond memories of their childhood here, but the city hustle and bustle added more excitement to their lives, and called them away to a different life..
The old folks no longer showed their horses, for the years had taken their toll, and getting out to the barn on those frosty mornings was getting harder, but it gave them a reason to get up in the mornings and a reason to live. They sold a few foals each year, and the horses were their reason for joy in the morning and contentment at day's end.
Angry, as they prepared to leave, the young couple confronted the old folks. Why do you not at least dispose of The Old One." She is no longer of use to you. It's been years since you've had foals from her. You should cut corners and save so you can have more for yourselves. How can this old worn out horse bring you anything but expense and work? Why do you keep her anyway?"
The old man looked down at his worn boots, holes in the toes, scuffed at the barn floor and replied, "Yes, I could use a pair of new boots. His arm slid defensively about the Old One's neck as he drew her near with gentle caressing he rubbed her softly behind her ears. He replied softly,
"We keep her because of love. Nothing else, just love."
Baffled and irritated, the young folks wished the old man and his wife a Merry Christmas and headed back toward the city as darkness stole through the valley. The old couple shook their heads in sorrow that it had not been a happy visit. A tear fell upon their cheeks.. How is it that these young folks do not understand the peace of the love that filled their hearts?
So it was, that because of the unhappy leave-taking, no one noticed the insulation smoldering on the frayed wires in the old barn. None saw the first spark fall. None but the "Old One".
In a matter of minutes, the whole barn was ablaze and the hungry flames were licking at the loft full of hay. With a cry of horror and despair, the old man shouted to his wife to call for help as he raced to the barn to save their beloved horses. But the flames were roaring now, and the blazing heat drove him back. He sank sobbing to the ground, helpless before the fire's fury. His wife back from calling for help cradled him in her arms, clinging to each other, they wept at their loss.
By the time the fire department arrived, only smoking, glowing ruins were left, and the old man and his wife, exhausted from their grief, huddled together before the barn. They were speechless as they rose from the cold snow covered ground. They nodded thanks to the firemen as there was nothing anyone could do now. The old man turned to his wife, resting her white head upon his shoulders as his shaking old hands clumsily dried her tears with a frayed red bandana. Brokenly he whispered, "We have lost much, but God has spared our home on this eve of Christmas. Let us gather strength and climb the hill to the old pine where we have sought comfort in times of despair. We will look down upon our home and give thanks to God that it has been spared and pray for our beloved most precious gifts that have been taken from us.
And so, he took her by the hand and slowly helped her up the snowy hill as he brushed aside his own tears with the back of his old and withered hand. The journey up the hill was hard for their old bodies in the steep snow. As they stepped over the little knoll at the crest of the hill, they paused to rest, looking up to the top of the hill the old couple gasped and fell to their knees in amazement at the incredible beauty before them.
Seemingly, every glorious, brilliant star in the heavens was caught up in the glittering, snow-frosted branches of their beloved pine, and it was aglow with heavenly candles. And poised on its top most bough, a crystal crescent moon glistened like spun glass. Never had a mere mortal created a Christmas tree such as this. They were breathless as the old man held his wife tighter in his arms.
Suddenly, the old man gave a cry of wonder and incredible joy. Amazed and mystified, he took his wife by the hand and pulled her forward. There, beneath the tree, in resplendent glory, a mist hovering over and glowing in the darkness was their Christmas gift. Shadows glistening in the night light. Bedded down about the "Old One" close to the trunk of the tree, was the entire herd, safe.
At the first hint of smoke, she had pushed the door ajar with her muzzle and had led the horses through it. Slowly and with great dignity, never looking back, she had led them up the hill, stepping cautiously through the snow. The foals were frightened and dashed about. The skittish yearlings looked back at the crackling, hungry flames, and tucked their tails under them as they licked their lips and hopped like rabbits. The mares that were in foal with a new years crop of babies, pressed uneasily against the "Old One" as she moved calmly up the hill and to safety beneath the pine. And now, she lay among them and gazed at the faces of the old man and his wife. Those she loved she had not disappointed. Her body was brittle with years, tired from the climb, but the golden eyes were filled with devotion as she offered her gift---
Because of love.
Only Because of love...
Tears flowed as the old couple shouted their praise and joy... and again the peace of love filled their hearts.
Everyone is scurrying around getting ready for the holiday celebrations. There are presents to buy and wrap, food to cook, etc. May we all remember this holiday season that the best gift we can give cannot be bought with money...it is indeed the gift of love.
"For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him shall not perish but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)
Here is the response I sent back to my friend:
Oh, how this world has become like the young couple.
But I have faith. I see a new light. There are movements going on around the world that want to see humanity restored.
Check these out:
http://vimeo.com/32929776
http://www.thrivethemovie.org/
http://www.the99declaration.org/
For your reading entertainment you may want to check out my blog:
Haysforpresident2012.blogspot.com
I am an Occupier in Los Angeles. I am making appearances before City Council. I plan to show movies and educate on Tuesday nights on the steps of City Hall on Spring Street (weather permitting)…I will post on my blog as the top header what my intentions are.
Our country is in far worse condition than most Americans realize. It is indeed going to take some miracles from God to get us out of this mess. I am an optimist. I believe in God. I believe in miracles. I think the miracles are already starting to happen.
Pray for peace. Pray for love. Pray for humanity to be restored.
Love,
Nadine
I hope you can feel my heart.
Friday, December 23, 2011
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
The Police Are Ticketing Me Because I Support The Occupy Movement
Below is the letter that I sent into the traffic court judge after receiving 2 tickets within a period of 4 days. I feel there is a harrassment order out, not only for the occupiers, but also for anyone that supports the movement.
111206 Letter sent to judge regarding 2 tickets I received -
"They" think that threatening us will just make us disappear. Well, we have news for them. In actuality, the more they fight against us, the stronger we become. That's my prediction, anyway. I will fight for what is right until the day I die (or "they" decide to kill me).
Why have I become so politically active in the past 2 years? Take a look at the video below and you might begin to understand.
111206 Letter sent to judge regarding 2 tickets I received -
"They" think that threatening us will just make us disappear. Well, we have news for them. In actuality, the more they fight against us, the stronger we become. That's my prediction, anyway. I will fight for what is right until the day I die (or "they" decide to kill me).
Why have I become so politically active in the past 2 years? Take a look at the video below and you might begin to understand.
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
How Would You Like To Be Thrown Into Jail Without A Trial?
I almost fell off my chair when I heard Senator Rand Paul in the following interview:
So they have actually had a bill proposed that would allow government officials to imprison U.S. citizens indefinitely, without a trial, based on someone's personal opinion? The wording that was used in this report by Ms. Crowly gave me an eerie feeling. She used phrases like "hostilities against the United States" and "acts of war against the United States".
It would seem to me that all of the participants in the Occupy movement, including me, could be thrown into that category. The one thing that is not clarified, however, is the fact that we have the lawful right to war against the U.S. government if they are doing wrongful acts. It is our duty as American citizens to fight for what is right.
I want to know the names of every Congressional member that voted in favor of this bill. Their constituents need to be alerted about how dangerous this bill would have been had it passed. It is my prayer that people like this will not be re-elected.
This should have been BIG on the news. The only way I heard about it was through a newsletter I receive on the internet. As we all know, the news is not the truth...it is what "they" want us to hear. That will change if I have anything to say about it.
FOX News has got to stop blaming the Muslims for what happened on 9-11. Most Americans are waking up to what really happened and it makes me sick to think that our own government officials participated in it. The truth will come forth in time and God already knows who did what. The true terrorists will indeed get the worse punishment possible...that of eternal damnation.
So they have actually had a bill proposed that would allow government officials to imprison U.S. citizens indefinitely, without a trial, based on someone's personal opinion? The wording that was used in this report by Ms. Crowly gave me an eerie feeling. She used phrases like "hostilities against the United States" and "acts of war against the United States".
It would seem to me that all of the participants in the Occupy movement, including me, could be thrown into that category. The one thing that is not clarified, however, is the fact that we have the lawful right to war against the U.S. government if they are doing wrongful acts. It is our duty as American citizens to fight for what is right.
I want to know the names of every Congressional member that voted in favor of this bill. Their constituents need to be alerted about how dangerous this bill would have been had it passed. It is my prayer that people like this will not be re-elected.
This should have been BIG on the news. The only way I heard about it was through a newsletter I receive on the internet. As we all know, the news is not the truth...it is what "they" want us to hear. That will change if I have anything to say about it.
FOX News has got to stop blaming the Muslims for what happened on 9-11. Most Americans are waking up to what really happened and it makes me sick to think that our own government officials participated in it. The truth will come forth in time and God already knows who did what. The true terrorists will indeed get the worse punishment possible...that of eternal damnation.
Monday, November 14, 2011
Why Is Obama Still In Office?
I just don't get it...
So we have proof that Obama's birth certificate is not authentic and Congress just sits there, doing nothing. I don't know about you, but that's NOT the reason I vote for representatives.
I vote with the intention that the individual I choose will do their best to uphold the Constitution of the United States and to do the will of the majority of the people. Come on Congress...let's get your act together and do what is right. Our future depends on you!
On April 28, 2011 the following information was posted on on Alex Jones' Inforwars.com website (see http://www.infowars.com/new-obama-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery/):
Our investigation of the purported Obama birth certificate released by Hawaiian authorities today reveals the document is a shoddily contrived hoax. Infowars.com computer specialists dismissed the document as a fraud soon after examining it.
Upon first inspection, the document appears to be a photocopy taken from state records and printed on official green paper. However, when the government released PDF is taken into the image editing program Adobe Illustrator, we discover a number of separate elements that reveal the document is not a single scan on paper, as one might surmise. Elements are placed in layers or editing boxes over the scan and green textured paper, which is to say the least unusual.
When sections of the document are enlarged significantly, we discover glaring inconsistencies. For instance, it appears the date stamped on the document has been altered. Moreover, the document contains text, numbers, and lines with suspicious white borders indicating these items were pasted from the original scan and dropped over a background image of green paper.
Let’s assume the state of Hawaii scanned the original document and placed it on the green textured background. This does not explain the broken out or separate elements. There is no logical reason for this to be done unless the government planned to modify the document and make it appear to be something other than it is.
There are two elements of interest, as shown in the image to the above – both entries for the date accepted by the local registry. This appears to have been modified in an image editing program.
The media was quick to dispel the fact the document was modified. “Our analysis of the latest controversy: The original birth certificate was probably in a ‘negative’ form, and someone at the White House took it upon themselves to doctor it up so the form can be readable,” writesJoe Brooks for Wireupdate.
Nathan Goulding, writing for the National Review, tells us anybody can open the White House released PDF in Illustrator and it will break out into layers. “I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home,” he writes.
Indeed, but this does not answer the question why in the Obama birth certificate PDF the layers or elements contain dates – which appear to be modified – and the signature of the state registrar. If the document was acquired from state records in whole, why was it necessary to add elements? Goulding and Brooks do not address this issue.
These layers are also revealed by the White House issued PDF’s hex file in freeware hex editor. Within its code are listed 8 image masks, which if changed from value “true” to “false” turn off and on to reveal the layers as demonstrated in the video and in Illustrator. Whether these represent compression artifacts or other digitizing processes, or whether these masks represent deliberate manipulation remains to be conclusively shown.
As Market-Ticker.org points out, it may prove to be significant that two of the boxes appear over both of the “date accepted” boxes, as well as the “Mother’s occupation box.” Was there a need to tamper with the dates on the document or other areas? The recent stamp date and issuing signature of the state registrar also contain an edited layer.
Questions have also been raised about the number at the top of the document issued by the Department of Health, number 61 10641, as one part of the number is in a separate layer when viewed in Illustrator, as demonstrated in the video above. This may prove to be significant. A long form birth certificate obtained by the Honolulu Star in 2009 from a female born one day after Obama and whose form was accepted three days after Obama’s document contains a Dept. of Health number that is lower, 61 10637. There are other subtle differences, such as the use of “Aug.” for the date rather than “August,” and the use of “Honolulu, Oahu” rather than “Honolulu, Hawaii” (seen also in the 1962 certificate below) which may or may not be significant.
More to the point, this certificate and others, like the one posted below it, have visible seals. No issuing seal can be seen on the document released today by Obama.
Negative of long form birth certificate for Aug. 5, 1961 birth in Honolulu, released in 1966 with seal and dated signatures.Published by Honolulu Star and World Net Daily in 2009.
Photo of physical copy of long form birth certificate for June 15, 1962 birth in Honolulu, also with visible seal.
Infowars will continue to analyze this issue as more information comes in. It is significant that the Obama Administration was pressured into responding to this controversy, whatever the final analysis of this document. However, the administration still needs to release his other records which have been sealed at great expense. Is there an issue with his being naturalized in Indonesia? Why are his college records at Columbia and Occidental sealed, and what do they contain? Did Obama travel to Pakistan on a foreign passport? These questions and many others have not been properly answered.
This information was discussed on camera; watch the video below:
Jerome Corsi discusses his research for his book in the video below. His book is entitled "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President."
Dave Bohen wrote the following review on Corsi's book. This review was published on The New American website (see http://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/books/8192-corsis-wheres-
the-birth-certificate-):
Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to Be President, by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D., Washington, D.C.: WND Books, 2011, 392 pages, hardcover.
It’s a simple concept as laid out in Article II, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution: “No Person except a natural born Citizen … shall be eligible to the office of President.” For over 200 years this straightforward requirement has pretty much limited those seeking the nation’s highest elected office to individuals born on U.S. soil of parents who are U.S. citizens. Until now.
With the election of Barack Obama, the nation has faced an array of troubling questions about how constitutionally qualified the 44th President of the United States really is to occupy the White House. At the heart of the matter is whether or not Obama was even born on American soil, something that has long been a concern to a large group of Americans the major media has deridingly labeled “birthers.”
But beyond this simple query are other key issues concerning Obama’s eligibility to be President. His father was an African national from Kenya, making Barack Obama a dual citizen of both the United States and Kenya at birth. Would this violate the intent of the Founding Fathers in their stipulation that only a “natural born” citizen can be President? How about the fact that when his mother later married a man from Indonesia, a young Barack Obama moved to that country and became one of its citizens? Would this compromise his U.S. citizenship and disqualify him to serve?
And what of Obama’s refusal to provide crucial passport and travel records stretching back to his early childhood, or the stonewalling by Columbia and Harvard Universities in providing records of Obama’s applications, grades, or financial aid — records that might, for instance, reveal that he was a foreign student studying in America?
As with past Presidents and presidential candidates, one might naturally assume that the history of Barack Obama would be an open book for the public to scrutinize — that, in fact, the major media would have an intense interest in ferreting out every tidbit of information and trivia in the rich and colorful biography of this altogether unique American executive.
One would be wrong on this count. In fact, not only has the media demonstrated a troubling inclination to give Obama a pass on filling in the holes in his personal history, in some cases they have actually allowed him to change his story in mid-stream without challenge.
Enter Jerome Corsi, an investigative journalist for the World Net Daily (WND) franchise, whose intense research over the past few years has resulted in an exhaustive WND-published report entitled Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to Be President.
Unfortunately for Corsi, the title of the book is predicated on Obama’s ongoing refusal — or inability — dating back to 2008 to produce a legitimate birth certificate that would prove beyond doubt that he was born in the United States. What makes the title so regrettable for the author is the fact that just weeks before the book hit the newsstands the President did, indeed, produce what appears to be his actual long-form birth certificate, which includes crucial information missing from previous birth certificates he has provided, such as the hospital where he was born and the signature of an attending physician. Where’s the Birth Certificate? Here it is, insists President Obama, in a perfectly timed move that seems to blow the premise for Corsi’s book out of the water.
While such a turn of events might well have relegated Corsi’s book to the humiliation of bargain shelves and dollar stores, Where’s the Birth Certificate? has continued to sell briskly, with Corsi, predictably, attacking Obama’s suddenly appearing long-form birth certificate as a forgery — something experts have confirmed would not be tough to accomplish.
But with or without the latest “proof” that Obama was actually born in Hawaii, there is still, in Corsi’s words, “a compelling body of evidence … that Obama is not a natural born-citizen as is required of all presidents by Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution.”
Central to the case — which actually gets somewhat short shrift as Corsi spends more time and space on the more sensational issue of the birth certificate — is the fact that Obama’s father, Barack Obama, Sr., was in no way a U.S. citizen, but a native of Kenya who had come to the United States for his education. In 1961, Kenya was a part of the British Empire, and, writes Corsi, under the British Nationality Act of 1948, “Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen … and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies, or the UKC, by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.”
Such a state of affairs would have raise red flags for the Founding Fathers, who “believed it critical that the nation’s chief executive and commander in chief possess undivided loyalty to the United States,” writes Corsi. He notes that the thinking of the Founders was profoundly influenced by 18th-century Swiss philosopher Emerich de Vattel, who believed that any given society can only exist and “perpetuate itself” through the efforts of “natural-born citizens,” which he defined as “those born in the country of parents who are citizens.” Vattel emphasized that “in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will only be the place of his birth, and not his country.”
To ensure that a President’s loyalties would not be divided between the United States and a second country, the Founders stipulated that only natural-born citizens (their definition mirroring Vattel’s) would be eligible to serve in that office. “Given this definition,” writes Corsi, “a person born in the United States to one U.S. citizen parent and a second who is a citizen of another country would not qualify.” Adds the author: “Obama’s situation is precisely this: He says he was born in Hawaii to a Kenyan father and a U.S. citizen mother.”
The phrase “says he was born in Hawaii” is significant to much of Corsi’s case because, until Obama’s long-form birth certificate suddenly appeared (out of nowhere it seems), he had apparently been unable to provide sufficient proof that he really was born in Hawaii. In fact, up to that time the most he had provided as evidence of his U.S. birth was a short-form “Certification of Live Birth” (COLB), which lists neither the attending physician nor the hospital where he was born. Significantly, the hospital changed in Obama’s story from the Queen’s Medical Center to the Kapi’olani Center for Women and Children, both in Honolulu, something that never seemed to trouble Obama’s supporters or the major media.
While much of Corsi’s research (including 83 pages of photographic documents) focuses on proving that the now largely irrelevant COLB is a fraud, the evidence he marshals in the process nonetheless strongly suggests that the President has engaged in an ongoing — and deeply troubling — campaign to hide the specifics of his background. Although the President had, no doubt, hoped to finally put the entire controversy to rest (and make Corsi look foolish in the process) by introducing his long-missing official birth certificate, Corsi’s account of Obama’s obfuscation about his personal history serves to cast severe doubt on this latest document.
In fact, Corsi’s contention that the President’s latest birth certificate is itself a fraud is given solid corroboration from a former senior elections clerk for Honolulu that Corsi cites in the book. Tim Adams recalled that when Obama’s constitutional eligibility became a serious issue in 2008, he was faced with answering the tidal wave of requests to verify the then-U.S. Senator’s birthplace. In his official capacity as an elections official, Adams had direct access to such state records as the Social Security database, the national crime computer, and state driver’s license and international passport records — “basically anything you can imagine to get someone’s identity,” Corsi quotes Adams as saying.
Concluded Adams, “There is no birth certificate. It’s like an open secret. There isn’t one. Everyone in the government there knows this.” As if to stress his certainty, Adams reiterated, “I can say without a shadow of a doubt that he was not born in Hawaii, because there is no legal record of him being born here.”
Of course, one state government official’s emphatic testimony does not, in and of itself, prove anything. But when it is added to the weight of evidence brought to bear by Corsi’s years of intensive research, one is left with grave concerns — not just about Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be President, but about the veracity of his official history, and how someone with so many unanswered questions about his past could somehow worm his way into our nation’s highest elected office.
So we have proof that Obama's birth certificate is not authentic and Congress just sits there, doing nothing. I don't know about you, but that's NOT the reason I vote for representatives.
I vote with the intention that the individual I choose will do their best to uphold the Constitution of the United States and to do the will of the majority of the people. Come on Congress...let's get your act together and do what is right. Our future depends on you!
On April 28, 2011 the following information was posted on on Alex Jones' Inforwars.com website (see http://www.infowars.com/new-obama-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery/):
Our investigation of the purported Obama birth certificate released by Hawaiian authorities today reveals the document is a shoddily contrived hoax. Infowars.com computer specialists dismissed the document as a fraud soon after examining it.
Upon first inspection, the document appears to be a photocopy taken from state records and printed on official green paper. However, when the government released PDF is taken into the image editing program Adobe Illustrator, we discover a number of separate elements that reveal the document is not a single scan on paper, as one might surmise. Elements are placed in layers or editing boxes over the scan and green textured paper, which is to say the least unusual.
When sections of the document are enlarged significantly, we discover glaring inconsistencies. For instance, it appears the date stamped on the document has been altered. Moreover, the document contains text, numbers, and lines with suspicious white borders indicating these items were pasted from the original scan and dropped over a background image of green paper.
Let’s assume the state of Hawaii scanned the original document and placed it on the green textured background. This does not explain the broken out or separate elements. There is no logical reason for this to be done unless the government planned to modify the document and make it appear to be something other than it is.
There are two elements of interest, as shown in the image to the above – both entries for the date accepted by the local registry. This appears to have been modified in an image editing program.
The media was quick to dispel the fact the document was modified. “Our analysis of the latest controversy: The original birth certificate was probably in a ‘negative’ form, and someone at the White House took it upon themselves to doctor it up so the form can be readable,” writesJoe Brooks for Wireupdate.
Nathan Goulding, writing for the National Review, tells us anybody can open the White House released PDF in Illustrator and it will break out into layers. “I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home,” he writes.
Indeed, but this does not answer the question why in the Obama birth certificate PDF the layers or elements contain dates – which appear to be modified – and the signature of the state registrar. If the document was acquired from state records in whole, why was it necessary to add elements? Goulding and Brooks do not address this issue.
These layers are also revealed by the White House issued PDF’s hex file in freeware hex editor. Within its code are listed 8 image masks, which if changed from value “true” to “false” turn off and on to reveal the layers as demonstrated in the video and in Illustrator. Whether these represent compression artifacts or other digitizing processes, or whether these masks represent deliberate manipulation remains to be conclusively shown.
As Market-Ticker.org points out, it may prove to be significant that two of the boxes appear over both of the “date accepted” boxes, as well as the “Mother’s occupation box.” Was there a need to tamper with the dates on the document or other areas? The recent stamp date and issuing signature of the state registrar also contain an edited layer.
Questions have also been raised about the number at the top of the document issued by the Department of Health, number 61 10641, as one part of the number is in a separate layer when viewed in Illustrator, as demonstrated in the video above. This may prove to be significant. A long form birth certificate obtained by the Honolulu Star in 2009 from a female born one day after Obama and whose form was accepted three days after Obama’s document contains a Dept. of Health number that is lower, 61 10637. There are other subtle differences, such as the use of “Aug.” for the date rather than “August,” and the use of “Honolulu, Oahu” rather than “Honolulu, Hawaii” (seen also in the 1962 certificate below) which may or may not be significant.
More to the point, this certificate and others, like the one posted below it, have visible seals. No issuing seal can be seen on the document released today by Obama.
Negative of long form birth certificate for Aug. 5, 1961 birth in Honolulu, released in 1966 with seal and dated signatures.Published by Honolulu Star and World Net Daily in 2009.
Photo of physical copy of long form birth certificate for June 15, 1962 birth in Honolulu, also with visible seal.
Infowars will continue to analyze this issue as more information comes in. It is significant that the Obama Administration was pressured into responding to this controversy, whatever the final analysis of this document. However, the administration still needs to release his other records which have been sealed at great expense. Is there an issue with his being naturalized in Indonesia? Why are his college records at Columbia and Occidental sealed, and what do they contain? Did Obama travel to Pakistan on a foreign passport? These questions and many others have not been properly answered.
This information was discussed on camera; watch the video below:
Jerome Corsi discusses his research for his book in the video below. His book is entitled "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President."
Dave Bohen wrote the following review on Corsi's book. This review was published on The New American website (see http://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/books/8192-corsis-wheres-
the-birth-certificate-):
Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to Be President, by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D., Washington, D.C.: WND Books, 2011, 392 pages, hardcover.
It’s a simple concept as laid out in Article II, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution: “No Person except a natural born Citizen … shall be eligible to the office of President.” For over 200 years this straightforward requirement has pretty much limited those seeking the nation’s highest elected office to individuals born on U.S. soil of parents who are U.S. citizens. Until now.
With the election of Barack Obama, the nation has faced an array of troubling questions about how constitutionally qualified the 44th President of the United States really is to occupy the White House. At the heart of the matter is whether or not Obama was even born on American soil, something that has long been a concern to a large group of Americans the major media has deridingly labeled “birthers.”
But beyond this simple query are other key issues concerning Obama’s eligibility to be President. His father was an African national from Kenya, making Barack Obama a dual citizen of both the United States and Kenya at birth. Would this violate the intent of the Founding Fathers in their stipulation that only a “natural born” citizen can be President? How about the fact that when his mother later married a man from Indonesia, a young Barack Obama moved to that country and became one of its citizens? Would this compromise his U.S. citizenship and disqualify him to serve?
And what of Obama’s refusal to provide crucial passport and travel records stretching back to his early childhood, or the stonewalling by Columbia and Harvard Universities in providing records of Obama’s applications, grades, or financial aid — records that might, for instance, reveal that he was a foreign student studying in America?
As with past Presidents and presidential candidates, one might naturally assume that the history of Barack Obama would be an open book for the public to scrutinize — that, in fact, the major media would have an intense interest in ferreting out every tidbit of information and trivia in the rich and colorful biography of this altogether unique American executive.
One would be wrong on this count. In fact, not only has the media demonstrated a troubling inclination to give Obama a pass on filling in the holes in his personal history, in some cases they have actually allowed him to change his story in mid-stream without challenge.
Enter Jerome Corsi, an investigative journalist for the World Net Daily (WND) franchise, whose intense research over the past few years has resulted in an exhaustive WND-published report entitled Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to Be President.
Unfortunately for Corsi, the title of the book is predicated on Obama’s ongoing refusal — or inability — dating back to 2008 to produce a legitimate birth certificate that would prove beyond doubt that he was born in the United States. What makes the title so regrettable for the author is the fact that just weeks before the book hit the newsstands the President did, indeed, produce what appears to be his actual long-form birth certificate, which includes crucial information missing from previous birth certificates he has provided, such as the hospital where he was born and the signature of an attending physician. Where’s the Birth Certificate? Here it is, insists President Obama, in a perfectly timed move that seems to blow the premise for Corsi’s book out of the water.
While such a turn of events might well have relegated Corsi’s book to the humiliation of bargain shelves and dollar stores, Where’s the Birth Certificate? has continued to sell briskly, with Corsi, predictably, attacking Obama’s suddenly appearing long-form birth certificate as a forgery — something experts have confirmed would not be tough to accomplish.
But with or without the latest “proof” that Obama was actually born in Hawaii, there is still, in Corsi’s words, “a compelling body of evidence … that Obama is not a natural born-citizen as is required of all presidents by Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution.”
Central to the case — which actually gets somewhat short shrift as Corsi spends more time and space on the more sensational issue of the birth certificate — is the fact that Obama’s father, Barack Obama, Sr., was in no way a U.S. citizen, but a native of Kenya who had come to the United States for his education. In 1961, Kenya was a part of the British Empire, and, writes Corsi, under the British Nationality Act of 1948, “Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen … and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies, or the UKC, by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.”
Such a state of affairs would have raise red flags for the Founding Fathers, who “believed it critical that the nation’s chief executive and commander in chief possess undivided loyalty to the United States,” writes Corsi. He notes that the thinking of the Founders was profoundly influenced by 18th-century Swiss philosopher Emerich de Vattel, who believed that any given society can only exist and “perpetuate itself” through the efforts of “natural-born citizens,” which he defined as “those born in the country of parents who are citizens.” Vattel emphasized that “in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will only be the place of his birth, and not his country.”
To ensure that a President’s loyalties would not be divided between the United States and a second country, the Founders stipulated that only natural-born citizens (their definition mirroring Vattel’s) would be eligible to serve in that office. “Given this definition,” writes Corsi, “a person born in the United States to one U.S. citizen parent and a second who is a citizen of another country would not qualify.” Adds the author: “Obama’s situation is precisely this: He says he was born in Hawaii to a Kenyan father and a U.S. citizen mother.”
The phrase “says he was born in Hawaii” is significant to much of Corsi’s case because, until Obama’s long-form birth certificate suddenly appeared (out of nowhere it seems), he had apparently been unable to provide sufficient proof that he really was born in Hawaii. In fact, up to that time the most he had provided as evidence of his U.S. birth was a short-form “Certification of Live Birth” (COLB), which lists neither the attending physician nor the hospital where he was born. Significantly, the hospital changed in Obama’s story from the Queen’s Medical Center to the Kapi’olani Center for Women and Children, both in Honolulu, something that never seemed to trouble Obama’s supporters or the major media.
While much of Corsi’s research (including 83 pages of photographic documents) focuses on proving that the now largely irrelevant COLB is a fraud, the evidence he marshals in the process nonetheless strongly suggests that the President has engaged in an ongoing — and deeply troubling — campaign to hide the specifics of his background. Although the President had, no doubt, hoped to finally put the entire controversy to rest (and make Corsi look foolish in the process) by introducing his long-missing official birth certificate, Corsi’s account of Obama’s obfuscation about his personal history serves to cast severe doubt on this latest document.
In fact, Corsi’s contention that the President’s latest birth certificate is itself a fraud is given solid corroboration from a former senior elections clerk for Honolulu that Corsi cites in the book. Tim Adams recalled that when Obama’s constitutional eligibility became a serious issue in 2008, he was faced with answering the tidal wave of requests to verify the then-U.S. Senator’s birthplace. In his official capacity as an elections official, Adams had direct access to such state records as the Social Security database, the national crime computer, and state driver’s license and international passport records — “basically anything you can imagine to get someone’s identity,” Corsi quotes Adams as saying.
Concluded Adams, “There is no birth certificate. It’s like an open secret. There isn’t one. Everyone in the government there knows this.” As if to stress his certainty, Adams reiterated, “I can say without a shadow of a doubt that he was not born in Hawaii, because there is no legal record of him being born here.”
Of course, one state government official’s emphatic testimony does not, in and of itself, prove anything. But when it is added to the weight of evidence brought to bear by Corsi’s years of intensive research, one is left with grave concerns — not just about Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be President, but about the veracity of his official history, and how someone with so many unanswered questions about his past could somehow worm his way into our nation’s highest elected office.
Saturday, July 23, 2011
I think I may join Concerned Women For America Legislative Action Committee (CWALAC)
I heard about this group of women as I was reading my "Impeach Obama" newsletter today. In case you do not know about Floyd Brown's website "Impeach Obama", I highly recommend that you sign up for his newsletter. So far I have read more truths on his website than I have experienced with the Federal Government.
Will we succeed in impeaching Obama? I don't think so. I only hope our Congress has enough intelligence to to prevent this man from doing more damage than he has already done. I certainly hope the American public has more intelligence than to make the same mistake and attempt to re-elect this man in 2012. Only time will tell.
Everyone needs a good laugh now and then. These days I especially need to get the endorphines going (it makes me feel better) and laughter does just that. Take a look at this ad put together by the CWALAC:
I have never heard of this group before, but what they represent is definitely my political platform. Here's a brief summary of their beliefs:
Definition of the Family
CWALAC believes the traditional family consists of one man and one woman joined in marriage, along with any children they may have. We seek to protect traditional values that support the Biblical design of the family.
Sanctity of Human Life
CWALAC supports the protection of all life from conception until natural death. This includes the consequences resulting from abortion.
Education
CWALAC seeks to reform public education by returning authority to parents.
Pornography
CWALAC endeavors to fight all pornography and obscenity.
Religious Liberty
CWALAC supports the God-given rights of individuals in the United States and other nations to pray and worship without fear of discrimination or persecution.
National Sovereignty
CWALAC believes that neither the United Nations nor any other international organization should have authority over the United States in any area, including economics, social policy, military, and land ownership.
Miscellaneous
CWALAC also deals with a variety of other family issues that don't comfortably fit into a category, yet are important to address.
Will we succeed in impeaching Obama? I don't think so. I only hope our Congress has enough intelligence to to prevent this man from doing more damage than he has already done. I certainly hope the American public has more intelligence than to make the same mistake and attempt to re-elect this man in 2012. Only time will tell.
Everyone needs a good laugh now and then. These days I especially need to get the endorphines going (it makes me feel better) and laughter does just that. Take a look at this ad put together by the CWALAC:
I have never heard of this group before, but what they represent is definitely my political platform. Here's a brief summary of their beliefs:
Definition of the Family
CWALAC believes the traditional family consists of one man and one woman joined in marriage, along with any children they may have. We seek to protect traditional values that support the Biblical design of the family.
Sanctity of Human Life
CWALAC supports the protection of all life from conception until natural death. This includes the consequences resulting from abortion.
Education
CWALAC seeks to reform public education by returning authority to parents.
Pornography
CWALAC endeavors to fight all pornography and obscenity.
Religious Liberty
CWALAC supports the God-given rights of individuals in the United States and other nations to pray and worship without fear of discrimination or persecution.
National Sovereignty
CWALAC believes that neither the United Nations nor any other international organization should have authority over the United States in any area, including economics, social policy, military, and land ownership.
Miscellaneous
CWALAC also deals with a variety of other family issues that don't comfortably fit into a category, yet are important to address.
Thursday, July 7, 2011
Agenda: Grinding America Down - (DVD)
Winner of the Jubilee Grand Prize at the San Antonio Independent Christian Film Festival!
Product Description
When Idaho Legislator Curtis Bowers wrote a "letter to the editor" about the drastic changes in America's culture, it became the feature story on the evening news, people protested at the Capitol, and for weeks the local newspapers were filled with responses. He realized then... he'd hit on something. Ask almost anyone and you'll hear, "Communism is dead! The Berlin Wall came down." Though the word communism isn't used anymore, this film will show the ideas behind it are alive and well. Join Bowers for a fascinating look at the people and groups that have successfully targeted America's morality and freedom in their effort to grind America down. It's a well documented AGENDA. (from WND)
Oh America, the Beautiful, where hast thou gone? Please, fellow Americans, start getting educated, see what is happening to our once beautiful nation. We will die if our people don't stand up for what is right.
Wednesday, July 6, 2011
Three Young Italian Singers Are A Great Example To The World
There have been so many disappointments with our country and the world lately that I had almost given up hope. Then I friend of mine sent me an e-mail with the video clip below. I don't know about you, but I sense that here we have 3 young men that have found great joy in sharing their awesome singing talents. I don't know anything about them, but I would say by their countenance that they have been raised in good families and have a great outlook on life.
It is at times like this that I often wished that the young and innocent would be running this world. It would be a much nicer place to live in.
It can be made nice again. I know it can. I can't do it. You can't do it. But if we all worked together, we can make a difference.
Only time will tell what society decides is important. I am an optimist. I am hoping that there are more people like me that want to have a country wiwith a government that is there to protect and defend their individual rights and freedoms, not suppress us as is currently being done.
It is at times like this that I often wished that the young and innocent would be running this world. It would be a much nicer place to live in.
It can be made nice again. I know it can. I can't do it. You can't do it. But if we all worked together, we can make a difference.
Only time will tell what society decides is important. I am an optimist. I am hoping that there are more people like me that want to have a country wiwith a government that is there to protect and defend their individual rights and freedoms, not suppress us as is currently being done.
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Is it possible to run a car on water?
I have really been concerned about the cost of fuel and the damage being done to our environment by fossil fuels. I ran across the following video which really intrigued me.
Here is another video with some very interesting information on Stanley Meyer.
I found these videos on the following website:
http://waterpoweredcar.com/stanmeyer.html
Below is what the website said about Stan Meyer, the inventor of the water powered car.
Stan Meyer's Dune Buggy that ran on water. Hydrogen/Oxygen fuel in an ICE motor. On board electrolysis, no hydrogen tanks, no bombs on-board, just water. (1998) It ran 100 miles per gallon! The 2nd best inventor of the Century, besides Tesla, who was and will always be #1. Stan is the mustard seed of Water Powered Cars!
The first video above is a one timed aired news cast, from his home town of Grove City, Ohio that you are not to view. The second video above is a segment of the Equinox program about Stanley aired back in Dec. 1995 (approx.) See the entire program entitled "It Runs on Water" narrated by Arthur C. Clarke in video clips below. It is in 4 parts, made possible by Andy the WizardKing from Blackpool, England. (These can be viewed by going to the above mentioned website and clicking on one of 4 video clips.)
The four videos can also be seen at the following site:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=871102105173074920#
The article then continued...
It was a shame to hear that he was poisoned (March 98') and longer with us. He died in the parking lot of a restaurant in his home town of Grove City, Ohio. Sharks came a week later and stole the the dune buggy and all of his experimental equipment, according to his brother, Steve. Stan said while he was alive, that he was threatened many times and would not sell out to Arab Oil Corp.s The Military was going to use this technology in their tanks, jeeps, etc. He had patents on his invention and was ready for production. Only $1,500 to equip your car! See the Videos above. No gasoline, just water. Stanley said he was offered a billion dollars from an Arab to basically shelf his idea. Stan said, "no, this technology is for the people." Who you suppose poisoned Stan? A jealous onlooker? Do you think the Oil Corp.'s are happy to see a converted car running for FREE?? Our own US DOE, and the present administration are heavily involved in the Oil business. If GW wanted my respect,I'd have inventors like Stan on TV and with me in the White House, discussing how to save this dying planet and break the bonds of ruled corruption and greed. I have read the DOE's hydrogen & fuel cell technology and they don't mention making hydrogen from pure water, until the last page. They rather get hydrogen from hydrocarbons. They don't mention "On Board Hydrogen Electrolysis" make the egas as you go. They talk about Hydrogen Gas Stations at how much per gallon?
So what is happening with Stan's Great Invention of the 20th Century!! Absolutely nothing. Are they manufacturing his invention. NO, Why not? Because it would solve all the world's problems today.
That is NOT how politics work, MONEY is the ruler here. Common Sense is NOT for humans, only good for OUTLAWS & so called terrorists.? Huh? We live in a time when good is spoken of as evil and evil spoken up as good. Why do I say that? Because it is true.
We were told the US twin towers was taken down by airplanes, when the truth is, it was taken down by C4 explosives. William Rodriguez holds the master key, he was there that day, he lost his job and 250 of his friends and colleges. Connect the dots, it is that simple. Sorry to have shocked you and made your face turn red, but Building #7 came down in 7 seconds, not reported in the 911 commission report. No planes hit that building, only a few offices fires happened. It was all too fishy from me, and continues to stink like a dead rat.
All they talk about is hydrogen gas stations run by Shell and a Canadian Oil Firm. Then they talk all about "hydrogen fuel cells" which take a lifetime of gas burned just to make one fuel cell. A hydrogen fuel cell factory is a real SMOG factory. To explain better read on. Their fuel Cells are not as efficient as a "On board Hydrogen Electrolysis" fuel cell. Stan made the gas as he drove, no hydrogen tanks, no fuel cells, no need for Shell Hydrogen Stations. He spent 30 years of research all on his own.
GOOD NEWS! Steve Meyer, Stan's twin brother lives! He is into the same
technology! He stays low key, because he wants to live.
Why is there only one website on him? WCCO.com News 4/11/06
To totally learn this technology go to
I have some .pdf files for you to
Download all of Stan's writings, circuits, etc.
StanleyMeyer.com
-------------------------------
Recent Harassment on a Stan Meyer Cell Builder in India 2-1-07
We are familiar with the suppression of free-energy devices. In the USA there have been literally thousands of cases - for example, Bill Williams for running his truck on a Joe Cell, T Henry Moray for pulling kilowatts out of the environment and Ed Gray for daring to have a power tube with an output power 100 times the input power.
In Australia there is intense opposition to anyone using the Nitro Cell on any engine. In New Zealand, to the magnetic motor of Robert Adams which is 700% efficient. In the UK, to devices for water-splitting and permanent magnet motors. In Japan to Teruo Kawai’s patented magnetic motor which is 160% efficient.
But in the last week there has been an instance of it in India, in spite of the fact that the bus service in Mumbai has been run on hydrogen for some years now. A man, who wishes to remain anonymous in order not to aggravate the current situation, has just been picked on. He has been running a business for the last 23 years and has a good relationship with his local Commercial Taxation Office staff.
He became interested in Dave Lawton’s replication and decided to try it for himself. The seven pictures which I have placed in the Files section of the Group in the folder “RAVZZ” show his high standard of workmanship. He encountered a minor problem with his implementation of the electronic driving circuit, and so contacted Dave Lawton for technical advice. This was given and the problem solved. He then e-mailed Dave some pictures showing his progress.
Within 8 hours, his premises were raided by nine people supposedly from the local Tax Office. In actual fact, six of them were from the local office and the other three were unknown to the locals who had been ordered to take them along. During their search of the place, the man was told that he would be well advised to discontinue all work connected to hydrogen. That shows clearly that the “raid” had nothing whatsoever to do with taxation and the Tax Office was just being used as an excuse to invade the privacy of an individual.
They spent six hours checking everything eventually left, taking commercial records with them, and subsequently requested that our friend attend their local office on Wednesday (the day before yesterday). He attended, sensibly taking people from his business as witnesses. The six local officials were there and they returned the records taken, stating that there was nothing wrong with the records or the tax position. They also said that they were bewildered by the whole affair. He asked them about the other three men, and they said that the Commissioners office had asked them to take them along....and they have no idea who they were!
He then had a long conversation with the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer who had came over to his place. He also seemed confused as to why they were hurried up to go over to his place from the Commissioners office. He said that the Commissioners office received a complaint from some higher authorities and these people were given written instructions (an unusual thing in itself) to go to his office and make some checks, usually this happens but the visits are done after 3-4 days of the receipt of the letter from the Commissioners office based on the time allotment, but in this case there were 4 calls directly from the Commissioners office to go over to his place immediately !!
This is a typical case of deliberate intimidation and it is unusual only because it is in India. It also shows that Dave Lawton’s e-mails are being intercepted and read as this man did not mention his hydrogen work to anyone else. Dave once made the mistake of applying for a development grant from his Local Authority. The grant was to help develop one of his inventions. He was visited by two unpleasant individuals who took away his written proposal. Nothing ever came of it and when Dave asked for his documents back, they lied, saying that they has posted them. When he pressured them, they did eventually send the documents back, and the date stamp on the envelope shows that the documents were posted long after they originally claimed that they had been sent. It turns out that these men have no connection with the Local Authority Grants section and it seems clear that they fall into the same category as the three “unknown” men in India who carried out the raid. Presumably, Dave’s phone calls and e-mails have been intercepted and monitored ever since and that is what triggered the raid in India.
The raid in India is very interesting in that it shows clearly that the opposition are very much afraid of Stan Meyer’s Water Fuel Cell. This implies that the cell is capable of producing serious amounts of free-energy and can break our dependency on fossil fuels.
February 2, 2007
Why is it that bad things happen to good people? Is this just a coincidence or is there more behind the scenes that the public is not supposed to see?
If I become President I will investigate and get down to the bottom of all of this. Good ideas need to be used, even if the financial purses of some dwindle.
Here is another video with some very interesting information on Stanley Meyer.
I found these videos on the following website:
http://waterpoweredcar.com/stanmeyer.html
Below is what the website said about Stan Meyer, the inventor of the water powered car.
Stan Meyer's Dune Buggy that ran on water. Hydrogen/Oxygen fuel in an ICE motor. On board electrolysis, no hydrogen tanks, no bombs on-board, just water. (1998) It ran 100 miles per gallon! The 2nd best inventor of the Century, besides Tesla, who was and will always be #1. Stan is the mustard seed of Water Powered Cars!
The first video above is a one timed aired news cast, from his home town of Grove City, Ohio that you are not to view. The second video above is a segment of the Equinox program about Stanley aired back in Dec. 1995 (approx.) See the entire program entitled "It Runs on Water" narrated by Arthur C. Clarke in video clips below. It is in 4 parts, made possible by Andy the WizardKing from Blackpool, England. (These can be viewed by going to the above mentioned website and clicking on one of 4 video clips.)
The four videos can also be seen at the following site:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=871102105173074920#
The article then continued...
It was a shame to hear that he was poisoned (March 98') and longer with us. He died in the parking lot of a restaurant in his home town of Grove City, Ohio. Sharks came a week later and stole the the dune buggy and all of his experimental equipment, according to his brother, Steve. Stan said while he was alive, that he was threatened many times and would not sell out to Arab Oil Corp.s The Military was going to use this technology in their tanks, jeeps, etc. He had patents on his invention and was ready for production. Only $1,500 to equip your car! See the Videos above. No gasoline, just water. Stanley said he was offered a billion dollars from an Arab to basically shelf his idea. Stan said, "no, this technology is for the people." Who you suppose poisoned Stan? A jealous onlooker? Do you think the Oil Corp.'s are happy to see a converted car running for FREE?? Our own US DOE, and the present administration are heavily involved in the Oil business. If GW wanted my respect,I'd have inventors like Stan on TV and with me in the White House, discussing how to save this dying planet and break the bonds of ruled corruption and greed. I have read the DOE's hydrogen & fuel cell technology and they don't mention making hydrogen from pure water, until the last page. They rather get hydrogen from hydrocarbons. They don't mention "On Board Hydrogen Electrolysis" make the egas as you go. They talk about Hydrogen Gas Stations at how much per gallon?
So what is happening with Stan's Great Invention of the 20th Century!! Absolutely nothing. Are they manufacturing his invention. NO, Why not? Because it would solve all the world's problems today.
That is NOT how politics work, MONEY is the ruler here. Common Sense is NOT for humans, only good for OUTLAWS & so called terrorists.? Huh? We live in a time when good is spoken of as evil and evil spoken up as good. Why do I say that? Because it is true.
We were told the US twin towers was taken down by airplanes, when the truth is, it was taken down by C4 explosives. William Rodriguez holds the master key, he was there that day, he lost his job and 250 of his friends and colleges. Connect the dots, it is that simple. Sorry to have shocked you and made your face turn red, but Building #7 came down in 7 seconds, not reported in the 911 commission report. No planes hit that building, only a few offices fires happened. It was all too fishy from me, and continues to stink like a dead rat.
All they talk about is hydrogen gas stations run by Shell and a Canadian Oil Firm. Then they talk all about "hydrogen fuel cells" which take a lifetime of gas burned just to make one fuel cell. A hydrogen fuel cell factory is a real SMOG factory. To explain better read on. Their fuel Cells are not as efficient as a "On board Hydrogen Electrolysis" fuel cell. Stan made the gas as he drove, no hydrogen tanks, no fuel cells, no need for Shell Hydrogen Stations. He spent 30 years of research all on his own.
GOOD NEWS! Steve Meyer, Stan's twin brother lives! He is into the same
technology! He stays low key, because he wants to live.
Why is there only one website on him? WCCO.com News 4/11/06
To totally learn this technology go to
I have some .pdf files for you to
Download all of Stan's writings, circuits, etc.
StanleyMeyer.com
-------------------------------
Recent Harassment on a Stan Meyer Cell Builder in India 2-1-07
We are familiar with the suppression of free-energy devices. In the USA there have been literally thousands of cases - for example, Bill Williams for running his truck on a Joe Cell, T Henry Moray for pulling kilowatts out of the environment and Ed Gray for daring to have a power tube with an output power 100 times the input power.
In Australia there is intense opposition to anyone using the Nitro Cell on any engine. In New Zealand, to the magnetic motor of Robert Adams which is 700% efficient. In the UK, to devices for water-splitting and permanent magnet motors. In Japan to Teruo Kawai’s patented magnetic motor which is 160% efficient.
But in the last week there has been an instance of it in India, in spite of the fact that the bus service in Mumbai has been run on hydrogen for some years now. A man, who wishes to remain anonymous in order not to aggravate the current situation, has just been picked on. He has been running a business for the last 23 years and has a good relationship with his local Commercial Taxation Office staff.
He became interested in Dave Lawton’s replication and decided to try it for himself. The seven pictures which I have placed in the Files section of the Group in the folder “RAVZZ” show his high standard of workmanship. He encountered a minor problem with his implementation of the electronic driving circuit, and so contacted Dave Lawton for technical advice. This was given and the problem solved. He then e-mailed Dave some pictures showing his progress.
Within 8 hours, his premises were raided by nine people supposedly from the local Tax Office. In actual fact, six of them were from the local office and the other three were unknown to the locals who had been ordered to take them along. During their search of the place, the man was told that he would be well advised to discontinue all work connected to hydrogen. That shows clearly that the “raid” had nothing whatsoever to do with taxation and the Tax Office was just being used as an excuse to invade the privacy of an individual.
They spent six hours checking everything eventually left, taking commercial records with them, and subsequently requested that our friend attend their local office on Wednesday (the day before yesterday). He attended, sensibly taking people from his business as witnesses. The six local officials were there and they returned the records taken, stating that there was nothing wrong with the records or the tax position. They also said that they were bewildered by the whole affair. He asked them about the other three men, and they said that the Commissioners office had asked them to take them along....and they have no idea who they were!
He then had a long conversation with the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer who had came over to his place. He also seemed confused as to why they were hurried up to go over to his place from the Commissioners office. He said that the Commissioners office received a complaint from some higher authorities and these people were given written instructions (an unusual thing in itself) to go to his office and make some checks, usually this happens but the visits are done after 3-4 days of the receipt of the letter from the Commissioners office based on the time allotment, but in this case there were 4 calls directly from the Commissioners office to go over to his place immediately !!
This is a typical case of deliberate intimidation and it is unusual only because it is in India. It also shows that Dave Lawton’s e-mails are being intercepted and read as this man did not mention his hydrogen work to anyone else. Dave once made the mistake of applying for a development grant from his Local Authority. The grant was to help develop one of his inventions. He was visited by two unpleasant individuals who took away his written proposal. Nothing ever came of it and when Dave asked for his documents back, they lied, saying that they has posted them. When he pressured them, they did eventually send the documents back, and the date stamp on the envelope shows that the documents were posted long after they originally claimed that they had been sent. It turns out that these men have no connection with the Local Authority Grants section and it seems clear that they fall into the same category as the three “unknown” men in India who carried out the raid. Presumably, Dave’s phone calls and e-mails have been intercepted and monitored ever since and that is what triggered the raid in India.
The raid in India is very interesting in that it shows clearly that the opposition are very much afraid of Stan Meyer’s Water Fuel Cell. This implies that the cell is capable of producing serious amounts of free-energy and can break our dependency on fossil fuels.
February 2, 2007
Why is it that bad things happen to good people? Is this just a coincidence or is there more behind the scenes that the public is not supposed to see?
If I become President I will investigate and get down to the bottom of all of this. Good ideas need to be used, even if the financial purses of some dwindle.
Ted Gunderson talks about U.S. government corruption and the Oklahoma City bombing
In March, 2011 I went into the Los Angeles FBI to see if they would do anything to investigate and/or prosecute individuals working within and/or for the Department of Homeland Security and specifically TSA (Transportation Security Administration). On April 16, 2009 I was wrongfully accused of battery by a TSA agent and was thrown in jail for over 7 hours. It took 1 1/2 years of my life and $20,000 to prove my innocence. I became directly involved with the investigative work as it related to my case and I have documented proof of 2 felonies committed by government officials against me during my prosecution. The agent looked at me in the investigating cubicle and told me they would not do anything. And this is where our tax dollars go???
While in the FBI building, I had the opportunity to meet Ted Gunderson. He used to be in charge of the Los Angeles FBI. If we want to talk about credibility, I'll believe this man before I believe anything that we are being fed in the media.
Here is a video interview that Alex Jones did with Ted in 2010.
I've sent for the CD's and will be posting some of the documents. One of them, which talks about how our government was involved in the Oklahoma City Federal Building bombing, is listed below. Althought the presentation might not be the most "professional", all of the data is there. I'll let you decide if Ted might be more right than wrong.
The Gunderson Report on the Bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building Oklahoma City_ Oklah -
While in the FBI building, I had the opportunity to meet Ted Gunderson. He used to be in charge of the Los Angeles FBI. If we want to talk about credibility, I'll believe this man before I believe anything that we are being fed in the media.
Here is a video interview that Alex Jones did with Ted in 2010.
I've sent for the CD's and will be posting some of the documents. One of them, which talks about how our government was involved in the Oklahoma City Federal Building bombing, is listed below. Althought the presentation might not be the most "professional", all of the data is there. I'll let you decide if Ted might be more right than wrong.
The Gunderson Report on the Bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building Oklahoma City_ Oklah -
Monday, May 23, 2011
I Can Run For President of the United States of America For Very Little Money
Congressman Gallegly just moved to Camarillo. That is indeed a blessing for me now that gas prices are so high. I had a very insightful conversation with Tina, one of his secretaries.
I told Tina I was going to run for President of the United States. She laughed at me and told me of all the "legalities" and money that would be involved.
I have not had the time to investigate this any further, but I will not pay fees to anyone to run for President. I think I should have the right to do that as a law-abiding American citizen. If I have to, I will do it as a write-in candidate. Here is what I read on Wikipedia regarding that:
The final way to be elected for president is to have one's name written in at the time of election as a write-in candidate. This is used for candidates who did not fulfill the legal requirements to be pre-listed on the voting ticket. It is also used by voters to express a distaste for the listed candidates, by writing in an alternative candidate for president such as Mickey Mouse or comedian Stephen Colbert (whose application was voted down by the South Carolina Democratic Party). In any event, a write-in candidate has never won an election for President of the United States.
Well, I could be the first!
I told Tina I was going to run for President of the United States. She laughed at me and told me of all the "legalities" and money that would be involved.
I have not had the time to investigate this any further, but I will not pay fees to anyone to run for President. I think I should have the right to do that as a law-abiding American citizen. If I have to, I will do it as a write-in candidate. Here is what I read on Wikipedia regarding that:
The final way to be elected for president is to have one's name written in at the time of election as a write-in candidate. This is used for candidates who did not fulfill the legal requirements to be pre-listed on the voting ticket. It is also used by voters to express a distaste for the listed candidates, by writing in an alternative candidate for president such as Mickey Mouse or comedian Stephen Colbert (whose application was voted down by the South Carolina Democratic Party). In any event, a write-in candidate has never won an election for President of the United States.
Well, I could be the first!
If a Pregnant Woman Saw Her Baby Maybe She Would Not Choose to Abort
I just was reading about some recent legislation that was being signed in the state of Texas by Governor Rick Perry. Below is the article that was on LifeNews.com:
Thanks to Governor Rick Perry, legislation that will allow women who are considering an abortion to see an ultrasound of their unborn child beforehand will become state law.
“Governor Perry was pleased to sign this important legislation, which bolsters our efforts to protect life by ensuring Texans are fully informed when considering such an important decision,” said Katherine Cesinger, a spokeswoman for the governor, according to various media reports.
The legislation allows women to see the ultrasound 24 hours before the abortion and abortion centers typically do ultrasounds to estimate the age of the baby before the abortion but they don’t normally allow women a chance to see or explain to them in detail the development of their unborn child. When used in pregnancy centers offering abortion alternatives, approximately 80 percent of women change their mind about having an abortion.
Women who live 100 miles or more from am abortion center wait two hours from the ultrasound to the abortion and they are given the option to decline to view the ultrasound.
The Senate passed the bill on second reading on a 21-10 vote and all hostile, pro-abortion amendments by Sens. Wendy Davis, Jose Rodriguez, and Leticia Van de Putte were defeated. After the Texas Senate signed off on the legislation, the state House, on a 94-41 vote, voted to concur on the Senate changes to HB 15, the sonogram bill.
During the debate, the biggest point of contention was whether women should be allowed to see the ultrasound 24 hours before the abortion so they have time to reflect on the information and images showing the development of their unborn child. Without the reflection time, legislators were concerned abortion businesses may rush women into abortions they may not otherwise want if given time for consideration.
Sen. Carlos Uresti, a San Antonio Democrat, said the 24-hour waiting time would make it hard on women who live in rural areas because they would need to make two trips to the abortion center.
Personally I think it should be mandatory for women to see the ultrsound before having an abortion. If you have not yet felt where my heart is, I think abortions should be illegal. It is indeed murder. Someone has to be pretty stupid to say otherwise.
Thanks to Governor Rick Perry, legislation that will allow women who are considering an abortion to see an ultrasound of their unborn child beforehand will become state law.
“Governor Perry was pleased to sign this important legislation, which bolsters our efforts to protect life by ensuring Texans are fully informed when considering such an important decision,” said Katherine Cesinger, a spokeswoman for the governor, according to various media reports.
The legislation allows women to see the ultrasound 24 hours before the abortion and abortion centers typically do ultrasounds to estimate the age of the baby before the abortion but they don’t normally allow women a chance to see or explain to them in detail the development of their unborn child. When used in pregnancy centers offering abortion alternatives, approximately 80 percent of women change their mind about having an abortion.
Women who live 100 miles or more from am abortion center wait two hours from the ultrasound to the abortion and they are given the option to decline to view the ultrasound.
The Senate passed the bill on second reading on a 21-10 vote and all hostile, pro-abortion amendments by Sens. Wendy Davis, Jose Rodriguez, and Leticia Van de Putte were defeated. After the Texas Senate signed off on the legislation, the state House, on a 94-41 vote, voted to concur on the Senate changes to HB 15, the sonogram bill.
During the debate, the biggest point of contention was whether women should be allowed to see the ultrasound 24 hours before the abortion so they have time to reflect on the information and images showing the development of their unborn child. Without the reflection time, legislators were concerned abortion businesses may rush women into abortions they may not otherwise want if given time for consideration.
Sen. Carlos Uresti, a San Antonio Democrat, said the 24-hour waiting time would make it hard on women who live in rural areas because they would need to make two trips to the abortion center.
Personally I think it should be mandatory for women to see the ultrsound before having an abortion. If you have not yet felt where my heart is, I think abortions should be illegal. It is indeed murder. Someone has to be pretty stupid to say otherwise.
Sunday, May 22, 2011
The Sanctity of Life
I really liked what I heard on this video. All I have to say is "Amen." Take a look and see what you think.
I too believe in the sanctity of life. Living by the standards created by God is of utmost importance.
Procreation is one of the most wonderful gifts we have been given and it is very upsetting to see so many people look at life in the womb as an object rather than a person.
If an individual is raped and they do not want to have the baby, they should be responsible enough to take the morning after pill. Once the fetus has begun to grow, it should be allowed to grow to maturity. There are so many people in this country that would love to have a baby and are not able to. Giving a baby away is far more appropriate than having it aborted. God has created that child and it should be allowed to live.
There is a famous phrase, "What God has joined together let no man put asunder." All though this phrase is is typically heard in marriage ceremonies, it applies to all of God's creations, including procreation. This phrase communicates God's authority over man. Some people want to deny God's existence. Personally I just cannot see how anyone can do that with the wonders of the universe, especially that of life.
Other key points made by Wendy Wright in this interview included the sanctity of marriage, the parents' role in the education of their children. the importance of religious freedom, and homosexuality. I will try to discuss these topics separately. That's for another day.
I too believe in the sanctity of life. Living by the standards created by God is of utmost importance.
Procreation is one of the most wonderful gifts we have been given and it is very upsetting to see so many people look at life in the womb as an object rather than a person.
If an individual is raped and they do not want to have the baby, they should be responsible enough to take the morning after pill. Once the fetus has begun to grow, it should be allowed to grow to maturity. There are so many people in this country that would love to have a baby and are not able to. Giving a baby away is far more appropriate than having it aborted. God has created that child and it should be allowed to live.
There is a famous phrase, "What God has joined together let no man put asunder." All though this phrase is is typically heard in marriage ceremonies, it applies to all of God's creations, including procreation. This phrase communicates God's authority over man. Some people want to deny God's existence. Personally I just cannot see how anyone can do that with the wonders of the universe, especially that of life.
Other key points made by Wendy Wright in this interview included the sanctity of marriage, the parents' role in the education of their children. the importance of religious freedom, and homosexuality. I will try to discuss these topics separately. That's for another day.
Friday, May 20, 2011
It's Time to Stop Being Ignorant and To Start Becoming Informed
Obama has never been my favorite president. Now I know why. Watch this video instead of CSI tonight. It's long but it will make your mouth drop open.
Some will say this is a conspiracy theory. I can tell you from my personal experience with the Transportation Security Administration, part of Homeland Security, that what they are saying is true. I too had my head buried in the sand of ignorance until I started doing my own private investigative work regarding the felonies that were committed against me by the Federal government.
What I now see I don't like. The country I used to love is now doomed to fail unless we as a nation wake up and take charge. After all, this is OUR country, NOT the government's. The government is supposed to work for us, not us for it.
Vote for me in 2012 and I will MAKE THE CHANGE!
Some will say this is a conspiracy theory. I can tell you from my personal experience with the Transportation Security Administration, part of Homeland Security, that what they are saying is true. I too had my head buried in the sand of ignorance until I started doing my own private investigative work regarding the felonies that were committed against me by the Federal government.
What I now see I don't like. The country I used to love is now doomed to fail unless we as a nation wake up and take charge. After all, this is OUR country, NOT the government's. The government is supposed to work for us, not us for it.
Vote for me in 2012 and I will MAKE THE CHANGE!
Working Together We Can Restore America
Below is part of a speech given by President Obama. Listen to it carefully.
Well, just as the people of Tunisia revolted, we the American people are about to revolt. We, however, are not going to overthrow the government we have today. Instead we will restore it to the government it was always supposed to be.
We can start off by throwing out most of the laws that have been created to suppress the American people. We probably will need to have a committee weed through the mess. Personally I think we can operate just fine with the 10 Commandments and the U.S. Constitution. I even have some improvements on that, but that is for another day.
Well, just as the people of Tunisia revolted, we the American people are about to revolt. We, however, are not going to overthrow the government we have today. Instead we will restore it to the government it was always supposed to be.
We can start off by throwing out most of the laws that have been created to suppress the American people. We probably will need to have a committee weed through the mess. Personally I think we can operate just fine with the 10 Commandments and the U.S. Constitution. I even have some improvements on that, but that is for another day.
Saturday, January 1, 2011
Tyranny is bad...
Tyranny is bad.
Freedom is good.
All men are created equal.
All men are entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Human destiny is what humans make of it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)